Message-ID: <27200488.1075844090998.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2000 00:30:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: mike.triem@compaq.com
To: colvin_craig@valic.com, eblansfield@ideon-inc.com, bgambrell@corestaff.com, 
	hank_kuczynski@valic.com, jose_beiro@agc.com, mreyna@agannuity.com, 
	mlokay@enron.com, miller_randy@agc.com, ncomstock@ideon-inc.com
Subject: FW: e-mail charges
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: "Triem, Mike" <Mike.Triem@COMPAQ.com>
X-To: "'Colvin, Craig'" <Colvin_Craig@Valic.com>, "'Ernest Blansfield'" <EBlansfield@Ideon-Inc.com>, "'Gambrell, Brian'" <bgambrell@corestaff.com>, "'Hank Kuczynski'" <Hank_Kuczynski@Valic.com>, "'Jose Beiro'" <Jose_Beiro@AGC.com>, "'Mario Reyna'" <mreyna@agannuity.com>, "'Michelle Lokay'" <mlokay@enron.com>, "'Miller, Randy'" <Miller_Randy@Agc.com>, "'Norman Comstock'" <NComstock@Ideon-Inc.com>
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Michelle_Lokay_Dec2000_June2001_1\Notes Folders\Personal
X-Origin: LOKAY-M
X-FileName: mlokay.nsf

Who knows if this is true....

Mike Triem
NA IPAQ & Displays Business Planning
281.927.8586

>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Subject: 602p bill-charge for e-mail -VOTE NO ON Bill 602P!!!!
>> >>
>> >> I guess the warnings were true. Federal Bill 602P 5-cents per  E-mail
>> >> sent.It figures! No more free E-mail! We knew this was coming!! Bill
>> 602P
>> >> willpermit the Federal Government to charge a 5-cent charge on every
>> >> deliveredE-mail.
>> >>
>> >> Please read the following carefully if you intend to stay online, and
>> >> continue using E-mail. The last few months have revealed an alarming
>> >> trendin the Government of the United States attempting to quietly push
>> >> throughlegislation that will affect our use of the Internet.
>> >>
>> >> Under proposed legislation, the US Postal Service will be attempting
to
>> >> billE-mail users out of "alternative postage fees".  Bill 602P will
>> permit
>> >> theFederal Government to charge a 5-cent surcharge on every E-Mail
>> >> delivered,by billing Internet Service Providers at source. The
consumer
>> >> would then
>> >> bebilled in turn by the ISP.
>> >>
>> >> Washington DC lawyer Richard Stepp is working without pay to prevent
>> >> thislegislation from becoming law. The US Postal Service is claiming
>lost
>> >> revenue, due to the proliferation of E-mail, is costing nearly
>> >$230,000,000
>> >> in revenue per year. You may have noticed their recent ad campaign:
>> >"There
>> >> is nothing like a letter."
>> >>
>> >> Since the average person received about 10 pieces of E-mail per day in
>> >> 1998, the cost of the typical individual would be an additional 50
>cents
>> a
>> >> day
>> >> or over $180 per year - above and beyond their regular Internet costs.
>> >>
>> >> Note that this would be money paid directly to the US Postal Service
>for
>> >> a service they do not even provide. The whole point of the Internet is
>> >> democracy and noninterference. You are already paying an exorbitant
>> >> price for snail mail because of bureaucratic efficiency. It currently
>> >takes
>> >> up
>> >> to 6 days for a letter to be delivered from coast to coast. If the US
>> >> Postal Service is allowed to tinker with E-mail, it will mark the end
>of
>> >> the
>> >> free" Internet in the United States. Our congressional representative,
>> >Tony
>> >> Schnell (R) has even suggested a "$20-$40 per month surcharge on all
>> >> Internet service" above and beyond the governments proposed E-mail
>> >> charges
>> >>
>> >> Note that most of the major newspapers have ignored the story and the
>> >> only exception being the Washingtonian - which called the idea of
>E-mail
>> >> surcharge "a useful concept who's time has come" March 6th, 1999
>> >> Editorial.
>> >>
>> >> Do not sit by and watch your freedom erode away! Send this to E-mail
to
>> >> EVERYONE on your list, and tell all your friends and relatives write
>> >> their congressional representative and say "NO" to Bill 602P.  It will
>> >only
>> >> take a few moments of your time and could very well be instrumental in
>> >> killing a bill we do not want.
>> >>
>> >> Please forward!
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>